It is now and continues to become more common for the majority of users of the present day to need to develop new types of enterprise or company software applications and platforms, and for various companies to produce product purchase and sale platforms and other forms of newspapers and/or news publications. When using an application, an individual’s experience when interacting with the application affects whether they use that application again, based on how often they retrieve relevant data from external data sources or your internal database system. The user experience in these user experiences will often affect the end-user’s ability to achieve results with the application significantly.

Many app developers have successfully been able to utilize Google Custom Search and Brave Search MCP services comfortably within their app creations and have also helped many app developers now explore how they may further utilize these kinds of search engine tools within their app development methods.

At this point, there needs to be some new search engines to provide an avenue for addressing this gap left by Google Custom Search and Brave Search MCP, as both companies have fallen short.

Why Teams Are Switching From Traditional Search APIs

Many people often select the Google search API to use as their main API due to the fact that it is available to almost all developers. However, there is a challenge with Google Custom Search, as it has a lot of limitations with regard to flexibility and scalability. If you are a startup that processes a large number of searches every day and will pay a monthly fee to the Google Custom Search API, the prices can quickly add up.

According to the 2024 Developer API Usage Report, 62% of developers using third-party search APIs are considering changing to an alternative due to the costs associated with third-party APIs or the lack of flexibility. In addition, third-party search APIs are estimated to consume 20-30% of the total cost of the backend for a data-heavy application.

This means that the Brave Search MCP is falling behind other solutions regarding the use of the solution for customization and scalability.

A product team member stated in a product management meeting, “A search solution should feel like an extension of your application versus a black box you need to find ways around.”

What Makes a Good Search Option

Considering the different aspects of various search options will aid in the decision-making process when selecting search options that fulfil the different needs of users. Ultimately, the most important thing to look for when selecting a search option will be that the option allows for the successful completion of your integration because this is the most valuable, and this will yield the best ROI. Another major consideration when selecting a search option to use is having flexibility in the way you use the search. An example of this would be switching from one search option to another, for example, changing from your existing search engine to ElasticSearch. All of the above will need to be viewed in relation to each other as you progress through the selection process, without slowing things down. Users will also benefit from taking advantage of your search as they will have a good search experience as well; therefore, your search interface must not include any unnecessary barriers to the search process due to the complexity of the many elements of search that can hinder the user experience of searching, and this should include some type of standardisation in your interface design as well.

Expertrec as a Realistic Solution for Business

When using Expertrec, businesses have total power to use the capabilities of Expertrec; they will have complete control of the process and will not have to go and try to develop a search engine for their website or application. In turn, businesses can have more control of their search engine that is developed and will end up requiring less code to implement a search engine versus other forms of API based search solutions.

Google Custom Search differs from Expertrec in how you will define your search settings, as well as the amount of time/cost associated with creating those search settings.

When using Expertrec, you know exactly what your cost for the search will be per use, regardless of the traffic you receive; while Google’s Custom Search does not guarantee you an exact price for the use of their product, it is difficult to predict what your usage cost will be of their product.

According to Zarpentine: “In a new report, organizations using custom search functionality will save approximately forty percent in total operational spending.”

Affordable alternative to Google Custom Search & Brave MCP

Take full control of your search experience

Switch to ExpertRec and reduce API costs while improving search relevance, speed, and customization. No heavy coding required.

Start Free Trial →

Quick setup • Predictable pricing • Scalable solution

Real-World Use Case

For example, consider a new company that is trying to track where users have been talking about them on social media and see if there is any type of negative content out there related to those users on the Internet. They will hit their quota at some point, and soon after that, 40,000 to 60,000 search requests per month would become a high-level cost with anything over the $2K range/month with Google Custom Search.

As a result, a custom-built Search site from Expertrec could provide more flexible solutions so that they can build a search solution with a personalized look and feel (i.e., interface) and have numerous rating and ranking options, all while saving money.

The fact that they are being provided with a low-cost solution and a custom-built solution is critical since this feature will be their primary selling feature on the application.

Quick Quiz

The Big Picture

“Search” is no longer simply an ‘option’, it’s now part of how value is created with products being developed. When using search services on the web (website, etc.) today, users want their searches to provide them with not only instantaneous opportunities but also very accurate results, as close as possible to real-time availability of results for the action they’re trying to perform.

Companies are utilising newer technologies to assume complete control over their search systems/processes due to advances in technology, moving toward total control of their company and its systems. Expertrec is highly recommended today because it has both simplicity and complexity that you can continue using as an easy-to-use and effective search solution.

Final Thoughts

A search ‘solution’ isn’t only about using the API. It will also affect your company/agency as you create it from an initial point of view to define the future use of your search solution.

If you are migrating from both Brave Search and Google Custom Search, now is a great time to re-evaluate all present options on the market (including Expertrec).

For companies that fall into this category, Expertrec is easily the best search solution available; it’s simply the right choice for how you want your search solution to improve your overall company productivity.

Ultimately, the best overall choice of which search solution you choose should also continuously develop along with the product